?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

We are. . .


very four years, the Democratic Party assembles a “platform” that outlines the party’s position on a variety of issues. Traditionally, the platform is written by paid professionals and then presented to the American people.

This year, that’s going to change.


http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/listening/

Comments

( 13 comments — Leave a comment )
terrorfakt_ny
Jul. 8th, 2008 06:18 pm (UTC)
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOORack O-BOOOOOOOOOOma


NO O!
razorslave
Jul. 8th, 2008 06:29 pm (UTC)
I'm curious where your objections to him as commander in chief originate?

I'm a moderate democrat who believes that people have the right as recently upheld by the Supreme Court) to own firearms, and the need for a strong military. I just can't face 4 more years of the rape of our economy by republican policy.

http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm
razorslave
Jul. 8th, 2008 06:52 pm (UTC)
Well I can definitely understand your 2nd Amendment Concerns, and I do, to an extent share them, although, at least for me, the concerns were greatly alleviated by the ruling of the Supreme Court.

Also, the Potential 2nd Amendment concerns are far outweighed, almost to the point of being a red herring, by the other issues on the table, namely, the economy and Iraq, and keeping us out of another war for oil with Iran.

**shrugs**
terrorfakt_ny
Jul. 8th, 2008 07:06 pm (UTC)
our economy is screwed regardless of who's in office,...Obama, McCain, Walt Disney,..doesn't matter.
(Deleted comment)
terrorfakt_ny
Jul. 8th, 2008 07:49 pm (UTC)
Re: why does everyone think iraq is about oil?
For those of you in the Military:

"Barack Obama voted against a measure to lower the Firearms Owners Identification card age minimum from 21 to 18, a measure designed to assist young people in the military."
terrorfakt_ny
Jul. 8th, 2008 07:47 pm (UTC)
--Well I can definitely understand your 2nd Amendment Concerns, and I do, to an extent share them, although, at least for me, the concerns were greatly alleviated by the ruling of the Supreme Court.--

The only people who will benefit from the ruling are the citizens of D.C. Seriously. I, nor any other citizen of any state will benefit from this decision.
All it means is that the people of D.C. have the right to keep a firearm in their house in the event that their life is in danger from an intruder.
(although it is going to now spark lawsuits in other restricted cities, like Chicago)

Granted had the decision gone in favor of the ban,...then that would have opened the doors for every state/city/town to invade people's privacy and take away their right to defend themselves and their family.

So technically we won nothing by winning, but won everything by 'not losing'.
razorslave
Jul. 8th, 2008 07:51 pm (UTC)
True to an extent, but the ruling by the supreme court, has opened the door for more lawsuits, and review of the various laws passed by state and local municipalities which will adjudicated based on the decisions placed by the supreme court. I'd say that's quite a foot in the door for reversing a lot of the laws that are rather draconian, and do strip the rights from law abiding gun owners.
axo
Jul. 8th, 2008 07:07 pm (UTC)
That's great. I hope that the tyranny of the majority doesn't take over too much, though.
(Deleted comment)
razorslave
Jul. 8th, 2008 09:50 pm (UTC)
wow, I may have to photoshop the bizzare image that is some distorted warped version of you and barack tapping that ass ( a donkey. . .)
(Deleted comment)
terrorfakt_ny
Jul. 8th, 2008 11:02 pm (UTC)
you're in Nevada right?
Montana would be up, as it is north of Nevada,...UP on/near the Canadian border.

(Deleted comment)
razorslave
Jul. 8th, 2008 11:07 pm (UTC)
Re: Donkey Punch
src="imagelocation"

forgot a couple of things ;p
terrorfakt_ny
Jul. 8th, 2008 11:09 pm (UTC)
Re: Donkey Punch
yeah it wont let me delete for some reason....

( 13 comments — Leave a comment )